Isle of Sanity

The death of journalism illustrated ...

2009-11-06T08:04:00.002-07:00

in a mere two sentences.

Stable. Interesting word choice because I should think this man wasn't particularly stable even before he met with a bullet. Then we go to the second sentence ... nice transition. And it took three of them to write this article (multi-authorial attribution being the norm these days) - I suppose it took all their collective brain power to de-sensationalize the headline by only blaming the major for the rampage.

It's a wonder people aren't trampling over one another to get their newspaper fix. It's one thing for the Idaho Statesman, a publication that would have to improve many fold to even be considered a merely dreadful paper, but there was a day when one could expect more from The Times (LA or NY).

Speaking of the Statesman, I caught Mi-Ai Parrish's (the publisher) talk at the City Club on News 91 the other day and ...Oh. My. Gawd. This individual makes a living in a field of words? Talk about failing upward but then again it may be upward in position though certainly not in papers as she has previously worked for the San Francisco Chronicle, The Chicago Sun-Times and the Minneapolis Star Tribune. I don't have hopes for the Statesman reaching the pinnacle of merely dreadful any time during her tenure.
[screenshot of LA Times article]

Prodigy

2009-10-11T09:49:00.003-06:00

Since my itunes library has grown I've found there are way too many pieces I don't hear often enough so I've taken to spending a little time each day, either with my cuppa in the am or in the wee hours, streamlining (removing unnecessary duplicates of slightly different versions, reducing all the artwork to 202 x 202 pixels) and rating the tunes. I'm now in the "Fs" and just came across this:

And I couldn't help but think of the phenomenon that Michael Jackson had become - and not to take anything away from acknowledging his musical genius but ... Stevie 12. Years. Old. Damn.

Nobel Awarded on Spec

2009-10-09T09:55:00.003-06:00

Excuse me? Obama was awarded a Nobel Peace prize?

It's not unusual for many to disagree with any particular choice of the committee, however, I can't recall another instance where an award was given (other than the presidency of the US - but not a Nobel) on speculation of actions based on rhetoric.

What. A. Joke. This diminishes all other prizes awarded by the committee.

To borrow from Barney Frank, on what planet do they spend most of their time?

PSA - Opportunity

2009-08-04T14:55:00.005-06:00

An opportunity is what the CableOne phone center rep called it. When I called to ask why, as a long-time customer of theirs, I was paying the monthly rate for 'premium' service but receiving the transmission rates of of 'standard' service, the rep informed me that as consumers called they were being made aware of the 'opportunity' to upgrade speeds for the same service fee or maintain their existing broadband speed at a reduced rate ($10/month).

Also, presumably in an effort to maintain cable television viewers, they have put daily usage limits that will be prohibitive of video streaming - let's say if you want to watch a movie through Netflix. Where's the FCC when they're needed?

So, if you've been with CableOne for awhile I suggest you contact them to ensure you don't continue to be overcharged because they're certainly not going to contact you.

Unfortunate Choices in Advertising

2009-06-10T09:54:00.003-06:00

Is that legal?

Fun with Photoshop

2009-01-06T10:02:00.004-07:00

Somewhere ~~over~~ at the end of the rainbow. I say somewhere because the shot was taken somewhere in OR but I don't recall where. Sometimes you need a little serenity. You won't get fries with it but (as always) you can click to biggie size the pic.

Fun with Venn Diagrams

2009-01-05T13:56:00.000-07:00

Exhibit A

They Call Me Mr. President

2008-11-05T08:05:00.001-07:00

Bring on the Fat Lady

2008-11-04T19:28:00.002-07:00

Obama takes Ohio and McCain/Palin is but an ugly memory.

It's Obama in a Landslide

2008-11-04T00:25:00.004-07:00

Obama gets 15 of the 21 votes cast in Dixville Notch, NH. They had 100% turnout. The bad new is the last Democrat picked in Dixville was Hubert H. Humphrey in '68 and we know how that turned out.

UPDATE: Hart's Location also goes for Obama 17 to 10 with 2 write-in votes for Ron Paul.

*Hopin' for a Landslide

2008-11-03T20:47:00.000-07:00

A picture is worth a thousand words and as the inimitable Daryl Cagle states with this one - there's only one way for McCain to win this election. If McCain/Palin comes out on top tomorrow, the Republicans have stolen the election. Again. Fortunately, I don't think this one is close enough for that to happen.

But a mere Obama win is insufficient - we need a landslide. And by we, I don't mean Democrats, I mean Americans, our allies, and the global community of which we are a part (or used to be at any rate). But mostly, our nation. We need to lay waste to the heinous fear-mongering, race-baiting, demonizing, and use of religion as both weapon and tool that have become staples of the modern Republican party. But, as they say on teevee, more on that later.

I don't think for a minute that tomorrow will end our long national nightmare ... it was a long time in coming. It's easy to blame Bush and the last eight years for everything (and Obama has certainly tried to make that case) but that's letting way too many Americans off the hook. At this juncture I almost feel sorry for Bush (almost). After all, other than the Iraq war, he didn't do anything that Ronald Reagan hadn't already done -yet no Republicans will be calling for his sainthood anytime soon.

No it's the ignorance and/or greed that led too many Americans to propel to viable candidacy a ne'er do well bully and drunk (with little concern for the consequences) that brought us here after our incomplete rehab from the Reagan/Bush years. I often wonder how they can sleep at night with the deaths of thousands upon thousands of innocent Iraqis and 4189 (and counting) of our military personnel on their conscious but then I suspect they spend as much thought on those lives as they did on the consequence of their vote (though I'm certain many have a flag on their car/home and a nice magnetic yellow ribbon on their vehicles).

My desire for a blowout tomorrow does not reflect any conversion to Obama devotee for me. I do not think he is (or will be) a transformational leader. He's most certainly not a progressive and -change? Well, I won't hold my breath but I am willing to be pleasantly surprised.

In the interest of full disclosure, I mailed my ballot a few weeks ago and cast a vote for Nader. I would have written in a candidate but as those ballots are handled separately I didn't want to contribute to an unnecessary delay in the vote tallying. However, in considering the consequence of my vote, had Obama had the slightest chance of taking Idaho's electoral votes I would have cast my vote for him (but yes, I am sick of the lesser of evil scenarios every four years).

The fact of the matter is that we have a political system in which two self-serving parties, neither of which represents the interests of the majority of Americans particularly well, rule (perhaps that more than anything will lead to our downfall). The end result for this election is a choice of Obama and not-Obama (although those of us in some of the solidly red or solidly blue states can choose an alternative without having disastrous consequences). While Obama/Biden is far from my choice for an ideal ticket, the McCain/Palin ticket is deserving of little more than ridicule (which is pretty sad for those of us who thought we had already hit rock bottom with George W. Bush).

Obama was correct in asserting that John McCain is George Bush redux but not merely because McCain, by his own admission (that's admission Sarah, not admittance), voted with Bush more than 90% of the time but rather because they are very nearly twins.

Jim Hightower once said of George W. Bush that he was "born on third and thought he'd hit a triple" and the same could be said of John McCain. McCain got where he is not because his personal character but by his paternal lineage. But while George W was able to steal home in 2000, John McCain was left on base. Like Bush, McCain the younger was a hothead and a hotdog but he also was never going to be promoted to admiral like his father or grandfather. While we might empathize with his desire to upstage them by becoming Commander-in-Chief that's certainly not a reason to vote for him.

If you're a hotdog behind the controls of a plane you'd better be a hotshot pilot as well but McCain was mediocre at best and we'll never no how much his hot-dogging contributed his being shot down and taken as a POW nor will we know how much disciplinary action his behavior drew or precisely the reasons he'd failed to be promoted because, like his medical records, John McCain's military records are off-limits. McCain is touted as a hero and I don't know whether or not he was one (his military records would provide the evidence) but I do know that we've thrown the word around like too much seasoning and not only has it dulled our taste-buds, it belittles true acts of heroism and those that perform them. He was a POW but that is a matter of circumstance and not a personal qualification for anything let alone president. McCain's hotheaded temperament has been well-documented and it also makes him ill-suited for the office.

I suppose it's ageism to suggest that we don't need someone born in 1936 to lead us in the 21st century yet while I can think of several men of similar age that appear to have their full mental faculties (Alan Alda, Warren Buffet, Jimmy Carter - just off the top of my head), John McCain is not one of them.

If we live long enough, we're all likely to succumb to dementia (she thinks as she readily came up with Berkshire-Hathaway but took another few seconds to recall Buffet) but it's clear that certain factors advance the progression. One such factor is stress and it would be hard to imagine anything more stressful than life as a POW. So while McCain may appear to be lucid much of the time, the fact he can lapse back to Vietnam and refer to the crowd at his campaign rally as "my fellow prisoners", makes it hard to argue that he's of entirely sound mind.

One might argue that his selection of Palin as running mate is another indication of his mind failing but I think it represents cowardice and/or cynicism at their worst. Cowardice in allowing your running mate to be selected for you and/or cynicism in using the religious right as a tool (a means to an end) once again and believing women and rural voters so shallow that dangling a female before them is all that it would take to garner their vote (yes, I know there's a small segment for whom this strategy will work).

So there you have it. McCain in a nutshell. Regardless of what you think of his policy positions (and there are not many on which I'd agree with him) or his campaign's race-baiting and fear-mongering tactics -he's too ill-tempered, a coward or cynic and signs of his mental instability alone (Did you watch the debates?) should be cause for worry and sufficient reason to reject him as a viable candidate for the office of president.

*Droppin' the "g" there is me bein' all quaint and folksy like and I assure you that, as a Minnesota native, I can throw in the Scandahoovian influence with the best of them so, perhaps, I should run for office (after all I've paddled my canoe to Canada from Rose Lake in the BWCA so I have foreign policy credentials up the ol' wazoo or is that the ol' Wasilla).

Beyond McCain's balancing on dementia's doorstep, his physical health is also an issue. Several bouts of cancer and several hundred pages of medical records are not only a testament to his advanced age but his relative health yet his records have not been made available for assessment so we're left with average life span of 75 years to assess McCain's viability through a single term.

First, we might assume, given his voluminous medical records (and the little we do know about crashes, cancer and torture and temperament), that for McCain it will be something less than this average. Second, these determinations are based on how long individuals born today might be expected to live and John McCain was born many, many, many yesterdays ago. So, statistically speaking, John McCain is probably already dead and just hasn't realized it (realization will come tomorrow). That means that if you are voting for the McCain/Palin ticket you are voting, in all likelihood, for Palin as president.

Sarah Palin is a dimwitted, ignorant rube and McCain's selection of her as running mate is an insult to every woman and rural resident with a semi-functional brainstem. Seriously, how stupid (not to mention full of yourself) do you have to be to believe that the President of France is going to call you for a chat let alone talk about hunting from a helicopter with you. However, not realizing an obvious hoax is one thing but her part of the conversation given she believed she was speaking with Sarkozy ... this is one stupid female.

Ignorant, and willfully so, because, for one thing, she continues to misstate the duties/role of the VP even though she has been corrected on more than one occasion - you think she could just memorize the correct response at some point.

A rube because, among other things, she thinks the proximity of Alaska to Russia confers some foreign policy credential on her.

Sometimes the options are so ludicrous, so ridiculous there's nothing for it but to laugh - McCain/Palin is such an option.

While a reasoned comparison of the two tickets (Obama is everything McCain is not - young, vigorous, even tempered and thoughtful - both are reasonably intelligent) argues for an Obama/Biden win, it has little to do with the necessity of a landslide.

A landslide is needed to make it clear that we, as a united people, Americans, will no longer tolerate the hatred, racism and bigotry that has been cultivated by the Republican Party and harbored by religion.

I'm not saying that racists, bigots and haters are only on the right side of the political spectrum but what I am saying is that, as an institution, today's Republican Party, through its spokespersons, candidates and national committee recruit, incite, foster and give voice to these people. As an institution, they promote divisiveness not on issues or particular candidates but on class attributes.

The Republicans may have rendered liberal and conservative meaningless (I'm still trying to figure out how a word that has liber [free] as a root can be a negative and I can't for the life of me discern what is conservative about the modern Republican unless it refers to the number of people to which they believe wealth and power is due) but that's not the same thing as rendering them useless.

No, liberal along with elite, has become something to avoid. Elite used to mean the best of the best -Nobel Laureate, Navy Seal, olympic athlete, summa cum laude graduate -but now although it's synonymous for educated, literate, well-informed, articulate, in Republican vernacular it is also something to hate (hence the attraction of Palin who is none of that while Obama is, as we all know by now, a liberal elite). I can understand why Republicans and Evangelicals are united in their derision of higher education as studies have shown that the higher education you have attained the less likely you are to be either a Republican or religious (particularly a fundamental Christian/Evangelical) but I can't understand why this would work as a divisive tool with the average voter - why they wouldn't prefer to elect someone demonstrably smarter than they are? Nonetheless -a hate-mongering tool used routinely on the stump and in ads by Republican candidates and the RNC.

One would think that Republicans would have to employ a little more subtlety (right former-Senator, Allen?) when fomenting racism and bigotry and, more often than not they do - they talk about Obama being different, not seeing America as they do, using his middle name (for no apparent reason), they may darken a candidate's skin color in an ad, talk about defending marriage (or failing to do so) rather than denying rights but their intent is clear - bring the hatred, the dark side, the base if you will, to the fore in a despicable effort to further their agenda -consequences be damned. Here, unfortunately, is where they partner with religion.

For those who hide behind or use religion as an excuse to be, for example, against gay marriage - I call bullshit. I don't care what inanity you believe, the facts are that every religious sect cherry-picks its dogma by selective interpretation of its given holy text so why is their vehemence saved for something that's barely mentioned? They dismiss some things by metaphor others by the state of the culture at the time the text was written but not homosexuality. I suspect most of this is due to ignorance of biology (but a discussion of our woefully inadequate educational system is for another time) - they believe homosexuality is a choice.

Galileo was imprisoned as a heretic for advocating something we all (well most - the whole functioning brainstem thing) take as given now - that the earth revolves around the sun not the geocentric view given a literal interpretation of the bible -interpretations were modified. While scientists haven't yet identified the specific genetic and epigenetic factors responsible for sexual orientation there is no doubt that it is not the result of making a conscious choice.

The Mormon Church (one of the most inane religious sects) has spent more than $20 million dollars to deny gays and lesbians the right to marry in California and I'm still trying to figure out how same-sex couples marrying is a threat to heterosexual marriage but then I've only been married 30 years (tomorrow) so I suppose we could still be torn asunder. I think the Mormons have cause for worry though because when the good Christians are finished with the homosexuals they'll need another target - maybe it will be those that they don't think are real Christians -like Mormons.

In his first inaugural address, Lincoln closed by saying:

We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield, and patriot grave, to every living heart and hearthstone, all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.

Obama is not a Muslim and even if he were that would not make him an enemy. Same-sex couples are not our enemies. Hatred racism and bigotry born of ignorance ... that is the enemy. I don't believe in angels but I believe in the notion of the better angels of our nature and hope you bring them along to the polls. We need a landslide to save us from our darker nature. Don't give it voice. Don't vote McCain/Palin.

At the very least, as Jim Hightower writes today:

As we traipse merrily into our voting booths, let's revisit the quaint notion that a government ought to be minimally competent.

Finally, I'm fairly certain I can count the times I've thought George Will was right about something on less than my full complement of fingers but I sure hope he's right here. Oooh - Larry Sabato's crystal ball, which has a fairly good track record, is also looking very promising and it's tragic that Obama's grandmother didn't live to see it.

It Takes a Swede

2008-02-04T23:16:00.000-07:00

To point out what myself and others, who are not caught up in the groundswell of the making-history rationale of candidate selection, have seen all along ... we have no left. Of the two Republican-lites, Obama is the worst. This is the kind of pandering, faith-based bipartisan wheeling and dealing you can expect with his leadership. The pretzel politician; he'll Bob-Barker us into oblivion.

Hillary stands up for MoveOn and votes against senate condemnation for their Petraeus ad, while Obama, as is often the case for controversial votes, doesn't bother to vote. MoveOn members endorse Obama.

Ah ... the American electorate. None more fickle, shallow, lazy or ill-informed. And so it is that:

From a European perspective, US politics are an ongoing battle between the extreme Right and the middle Right. The Republican presidential candidates are really, really scary people in my view. So all of us in the world at large who live under the shadow of US political hegemony are holding our breaths, hoping that Clinton or Obama will make it into office. They're pretty bad, but the alternative would be unspeakably dreadful.

The bar so low but the placement ... ours.

Enter Stage Left

2008-01-30T20:37:00.000-07:00

Spoiler alert.

Left* With No Choice

2008-01-30T07:55:00.000-07:00

It appears that Edwards will drop out of the race today. Given the huge crowd yesterday in Minnesota, I find it difficult to believe that he would drop out before Tuesday unless it has to do with Elizabeth's health - she was not with him yesterday. My daughter, who was at the rally, said he appeared weary but she chalked it up to exhaustion ... perhaps, not.

Be well, Edwards family.

*double entendre intended

Can They Hear You Now?

2008-01-27T12:22:00.000-07:00

Last Thursday the U.S. Senate [The House not even being in session because the Republicans, who after their years in power with a 2 1/2-day work week are having difficulty adjusting to a nearly 4-day work week, needed a break] killed the only semi-sane FISA bill (Judiciary Committee bill) and where were your candidates ... your wanna be leaders? [I say your because I have no intention of voting for either Clinton or Obama]

Nowhere in sight. Encourage them to act like leaders and be in DC to vote no on cloture for the heinous FISA bill that the Bush Administration and GOP are pushing [with additional help from the twat, Harry Reid, who while both honoring GOP bill holds and not requiring them to actually filibuster Dem bills has failed to extend the same respect/courtesy to Senator Dodd -a member of his own party].

Read this from Senator Dodd, a former presidential candidate who has demonstrated leadership on this important issue as well as others affecting the erosion of our constitution.

Pay attention. Make some calls, send some faxes. Demand accountability. Demand oversight. Demand leadership.

Update: Well. Well. Guess the phone calls had an impact. Clinton and Obama will both be in DC to vote against cloture tomorrow.

Nontrivial Empty Gestures for $600, Alex

2008-01-27T08:36:00.000-07:00

A gift for the investor who has everything.

What is a stimulus package.

In an election year we can depend on the usual bipartisan 50 point drop in I.Q. of our elected representatives. Hey Congress ... try stimulating this.

Larry the Grammarian

2008-01-08T23:07:00.000-07:00

Oh. My. This just keeps on getting better. Larry's lawyer filed a 27-page brief formally initiating an appeal of the judge's October ruling rejecting his plea withdrawal argument.

In it they argue that wittle Warry's actions couldn't have been a crime because 1) they could not have been offensive to the officer because he invited Craig's response and 2) the law states that "the conduct at issue have a tendency to alarm or anger others" and there was only wun wittle officer.

Another 0.25%

2008-01-08T21:58:00.000-07:00

No, not interest rates but the approximate additional percentage of the electorate that cast their votes in New Hampshire today.

Hillary stole Obama's crown and perhaps the largest state in the union will, for the first time since this ridiculous primary system was installed decades ago, have an impact in deciding our nominee.

It doesn't mean the outcome will be any better (I don't imagine the coverage will change. Edwards will remain invisible, Hillary's just a girl so she can be attacked from 360° and Obama gets a free ride) but at least it will be decided by a larger portion of the voting population and a most definitely more representative cross-section.

Once again, the ratio of Dems/Rep was reported about 2:1. So the message to the Republican candidates is that your peops are not that into you.

The Headline That Should Have Been

2008-01-04T16:06:00.000-07:00

IOWA VOTERS DIVIDED ON WHO SHOULD LEAD COUNTRY

Anything other than that dismisses the votes of the majority of Iowa caucus participants.

Two things are crystal clear from the Iowa caucus yesterday. A three-way Democratic split demonstrates that Iowans are in some disagreement over which specific candidate should be the nominee, but the nearly 2:1 Democrat:Republican caucus turnout and the fact that Hillary, the 3rd place Democratic vote-getter received nearly twice as many votes as the leading Republican candidate, Huckabee, leaves little doubt as from which party Iowans think the next president should come.

Obama's Premature Ejaculation Oration

2008-01-04T08:56:00.000-07:00

Yes, with more than 60% of the caucus voters in a single state voting for a candidate other than him, he makes a speech as if he's not only won the Democratic nomination, but the presidency.

...Years from now, you'll look back and you'll say that this was the moment, this was the place where America remembered what it means to hope...

America? Hardly. Yes, this the change we need. We've never had a sanctimonious empty suit in the White House before.

The Trouble with Elections

2008-01-03T12:03:00.000-07:00

I was driving around the other day and saw a vehicle with the Darwin fish emblem and a Ron Paul sticker on the bumper - makes you wonder how little the person knows about his other wacky positions.

That's the problem with elections - an astoundingly uninformed electorate.

Hillary as a progressive and Obama as a change agent ... right.

Hey Iowa, ABCO (Anybody But Clinton or Obama) - you owe us for Kerry last time around.

Fun w/ Venn Diagrams

2007-12-05T13:01:00.000-07:00

You know I never thought Barbara Walters could out dumb *teh dumb of that blond chick. However, a few months ago she added Sherri unsure of the earth's roundness Shephard to the show and now ...she's even outdone herself. Sherri evidently hasn't heard of B.C. because she doesn't believe " ... anything predated christians ..." and that Jesus came before the Greeks and the Romans.

But hey, she's just a talk show flunky on a program of which the viewership primarily consists of those possessing a similar level of sophistication but what of a presidential candidate?

Yes, Mike believer of creation, nonbeliever of evolution Huckabee who touts his theology degree as a foreign policy credential can't, apparently, even keep up with current events. Never mind that the National Intelligence Estimate has been in the news for days (as well as numerous times during the Bush reign) and that the Idiot in Chief (a member of Mike's own political party) thought it significant enough to hold a presser but elect-me Mike don't know nothin' 'bout no 'telligence. [my apologies to Margaret Mitchell. Also, obviously, the diagram is not to scale. Although Sherri and Mike are truly huge ignoramuses they certainly don't comprise quite the percentage of their ilk represented in the pic.]

And for the record ... you don't get to not believe in Evolution; it's not a belief system. Nor is it random or an accident. However, evolution deniers are correct on one point ... it's not a fact. Not a single one anyway. It's many many facts based on voluminous observations and testable, and tested, hypotheses leading to the theory.

You see, while it may be used in a manner to indicate as much, a theory is not a hunch. It's not something flimsy or weak but a very strong foundation that has been strengthened and refined over time. Evolution may never be a law, not owing to any deficiency but because laws tend to be mathematical in nature -equations with predictable solutions.

But while there's not any all encompassing evolutionary equation for which we can enter v, w and x evolutionary variables to solve for z that's not to say it doesn't have predictive capability. As a demonstrated theory that's a necessity. Long before the fossil record obliged by contributing a physical record, features of expected transitional species to fill in existing gaps in the evolutionary trail were predicted by scientists. For example, Tiktaalik discovered only last year looks (as expected) like a cross between primitive fish and the early tetrapods (4-legged animals) and represents the earliest appearance of tetrapod features - and around 12 million years before the first tetrapods.

Let's face it, most people find it difficult to solve even simple mathematical equations (another failure of our educational system but that's a topic for another day), evolution is a complex theory and the scale of evolutionary time is hard to fathom (perhaps especially so for such an ego-centric population as is our nation) but we really have to start to be aggressive in challenging all of this 'random' nonsense. It's just plain wrong. Wrong and dangerous.

Of course, like every other man of intelligence and education I do believe in organic evolution. It surprises me that at this late date such questions should be raised.

That was from Woodrow Wilson in 1922. Look where we are today. It's sad. It's depressing. Looking at the Republican candidates for president certainly doesn't assuage the feeling. Seriously, when was the last time the Republican party fielded a candidate that wasn't bat-shit crazy?

Okay, tirade finished. Sometimes you just have to get it out.

*Not a typo ... convention.

The God-Forsaken Rockies

2007-10-28T22:06:00.000-06:00

Not so chosen after all. Never mind belief in a supernatural entity keeping tabs on us all, it takes a particular arrogance to think that entity would care about the outcome of any given sporting event let alone backing a particular team. I don't really care about baseball but when the Rockies made it into the World Series, I wanted Boston in 4. Thank you, ~~God~~ Sox!

Hitting the Sauce Juice

2007-10-28T12:04:00.000-06:00

Craig who, of course, never solicited sex in the MSP airport restroom, having lost the appeal to withdraw his guilty plea, tries another tack. Along the lines of OJ Simpson's If I Did It approach, Larry now wants us to believe (or rather a MN appeals court judge to swallow) that though he didn't do it, if he were to have done it, he should not have been able to plead guilty to it, because it would not have been a crime, as it would have represented free speech and therefore would have been protected by the Constitution.

Irony, along with hypocrisy, is alive and well in the Republican party. Craig who has acted as a rubber stamp for this administration while they have shred that same document by the use of torture, illegal wire-tapping, denial of habeas and the latest proposal of retroactive immunity for the criminally-inclined telecom corporations, thinks his solicitation of sex in a public bathroom should be a protected legal right.

We also learned that Craig had Mr. Martin (a criminal defense attorney) on retainer not merely before he entered his guilty plea but before he was even arrested.

While I never bought Craig's lie that he didn't consult an attorney before rendering his plea, the fact that he included that apparent lie in his formal (legal) filings with the court is tantamount to lying under oath. I categorize the lie as being apparent only in the sense that Larry hired an attorney to expressly defend him from the onslaught of the Idaho Statesman in efforts to out him as a nasty, naughty gay boy yet apparently was too embarrassed to let him in on his little arrest issue.

So, the saga continues and we can look forward to new allegations and other humiliating reports about the sad, pathetic, senator who refuses to admit he's no longer wanted by his party or his constituents. Maybe someday this will be made into an opera.

A Work Around

2007-10-11T12:40:00.000-06:00

Larry LaRocco, while not trading places, has been familiarizing himself with the vocations of various people across the state in an effort to understand how best to represent them in the U.S. Senate. Here's lucky number 11: